OLANZAPINE        KEY CLAIMS 
Reduced relapse rate
Longer time to relapse
At least as effective as lithium
OFC in bipolar depression
No treatment-emergent mania
Improvements in HR-Qol
Fewer drop-outs than lithium
No QTc prolongation
Usage
Supported by GSK.
(c) 2004 Excerpta Medica
All rights reserved.
Disclaimer
print this page
 Key claims

Strengths:

  • Well-documented efficacy in acute mania and maintenance therapy – less so for bipolar depression (OFC). 
  • Potential antidepressant effect.
  • Low EPS risk (compared with conventional antipsychotics, e.g. haloperidol).

Weaknesses:

  • Causes weight gain.
  • Associated with diabetes and hyperglycemia (class effect).
  • Associated with hyperprolactemia (class effect). 
  • Associated with somnolence and depression (side effect).

Key claims:

Efficacy:

Tolerability:

General/positioning: 

GSK counterclaims:

  • Olanzapine has never been studied as a maintenance treatment in patients who were initially depressed at study entry.
  • Olanzapine has been shown to be no more effective than lithium in preventing depressive episodes.
  • The effect size for olanzapine in the treatment of acute bipolar depression is modest and smaller than that of lamotrigine. 
  • Both olanzapine and OFC caused significant weight gain after only 8 weeks of treatment. 
  • Depression and somnolence are consistently among the most frequently side effects observed with olanzapine maintenance treatment.
  • Weight gain has been a significant issue in olanzapine treatment observed in every clinical trial presented to date.

Guidelines

 

extra-pyramidal symptoms
health-related quality of life
olanzapine fluoxetine combination
olanzapine fluoxetine combination
olanzapine fluoxetine combination
olanzapine fluoxetine combination
olanzapine fluoxetine combination
olanzapine fluoxetine combination
quality of life


  
  
home help sitemap acronyms help sitemap home